Showing posts with label U.K.. Show all posts
Showing posts with label U.K.. Show all posts

Thursday, July 24, 2008

BRIT CONSERVATIVE CAUGHT WITH ANOTHER MAN!

Oh Those Male Conservatives... No matter which part of the world, some of them are being caught being 2 faced.. In the sense that they proclaim being gay is wrong, however they are being caught in sexual acts with other men. It makes me laugh.. Read this story about a Male Brit Conservative:

A Conservative councillor in Harrow has appeared in court charged with engaging in sexual activity in a public lavatory.

Robert Benson did not enter a plea at Harrow Magistrates' Court last week.

He has been suspended from the party but remains a councillor.

Mr Benson, 41, is accused of giving oral sex to another man in a public toilet in south Harrow on June 25th.

He was arrested and bailed until July 8th, when he was charged.

A 56-year-old from Essex man was issued with a caution. Mr Benson's case will be heard on 30th July at Wimbledon Magistrates Court. [SOURCE]

Sucks to be you Benson.. Hypocrit.. thats all i can say!

Wednesday, July 16, 2008

U.K. INCREASES MINORITY REPRESENTATION BUT EXCLUDES GAYS

In the U.K, the government wants to increase the representation of women, ethnic minorities and disabled people to the boards of public bodies. However, when looked closely at this new plan, sexual orientation was not included.

Uh Oh... Definately going to have some upset Gays in the house:

Harriet Harman, Secretary of State for Equality, said:
"Our ultimate aim is to have fair representation of women, black and Asian, and disabled people at every level of our democracy, including in public bodies.


"I'm going to keep a sharp eye on appointments made by each government department."

In response to the Harman's words Derek Munn, head of public affairs for gay equality organisation Stonewall, said:

"Given the government's aim of extend equal protect to sexual orientation, Stonewall expects this to apply in every area of the government's work and public appointments are no different." [SOURCE]

FIGHT.. FIGHT... FIGHT.. Just jokin.. but still I wonder why gays were left out??

Thursday, July 10, 2008

U.K.: LEGITIMISED HOMOPHOBIA??

Across the big pond in the U.K., upset has occured with the gay community. A court ruled in favour of Lillian Ladele, who claimed that she was discriminated against because of her religion when she refused to conduct civil partnership ceremonies while employed by Islington council.

Peter Tatchell, the gay rights and human rights campaigner, said that the ruling in favour of Lillian Ladele is "a dangerous subversion of the democratic principle that everyone should have equal rights and responsibilities under the law."

"The tribunal has ruled that people of faith are above the law," said Mr Tatchell.

"They can plead conscientious objection and be exempt from the laws that apply to everyone else.

"If this judgment stands, it will pave the way for religious people to have the legal entitlement to discriminate on conscientious grounds against people of other faiths, unmarried parents and many others who they condemn as immoral." [SOURCE]

Wow, this is insane.. What Tatchell is saying is true. He goes on talking about how Firemen, cops and other public services can soon deny help to those gays in need if their religious rights are againt homosexuals. CRAZY STUFF PEOPLE!!

Monday, July 7, 2008

GAY COUPLES IN BRISTOL (UK) MUST FIND SOME NEW BUSHES TO HAVE OUTDOOR FUN IN..

OK, so this story was brought to me by my co-worker Gillette. I love how she finds me some gay stories for my blog.. Actively looking, however it's always stuff from the U.K. Ha ha ha.. Aww Love her. Anyways, moving onwards with the story, read below:

Few park visitors would object to cutting back overgrown bushes.

But to some members of the gay community, the undergrowth at a popular Bristol beauty spot is something to be protected.

And when the council proposed removing the bushes for conservation purposes, they were met with an unusually dogged response.

The council's own gay rights group said such actions would be 'discriminating' to homosexual and bisexual men who are known to use the area for outdoor sex.

As a result, the consultation process was forced to include discussions with gay rights groups about their concerns. [SOURCE]

I dunno, i dont think the gays have a great defence with this one. I mean i am all for having "sexy-times" outdoors but if people are being caught in this area then that does say something.. Time to move on to another area... Simple as that!!
For more of the story click here.